diff --git a/content/posts/laravel-beware-of-touches.md b/content/posts/laravel-beware-of-touches.md
index 4fbfb29..de29f42 100644
--- a/content/posts/laravel-beware-of-touches.md
+++ b/content/posts/laravel-beware-of-touches.md
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ This query will basically generate a single update to bump the roles.updated_at
 update roles set roles.updated_at = now() where roles.id in (1, 2, 3)
 ```
 
-will be executed. (in this example the user has the role 1, 2 and 3 affected)
+Will be executed. (in this example the user has the role 1, 2 and 3 affected)
 
 ### And the problem?
 
@@ -132,7 +132,9 @@ This limit in MySQL is currently at
 The way we have handled this situation was simply by not using `$touches`, and manually doing the touches chunk by chunk
 on the roles to not reach the limit.
 
-I have chosen to use [listeners](https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/events#registering-events-and-listeners) for that.
+I have chosen to use [listeners](https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/events#registering-events-and-listeners) for that. The
+idea behind listeners is really simple: each time a model is _created_, _updated_, _saved_, _deleted_, an event is
+dispatched, and you can react on it by writing special listener.
 
 ### Define the UserSaved event
 
@@ -148,7 +150,7 @@ and then references it in the model:
 namespace App\Models;
 
 /**
- * @property Collection<Child> $childs
+ * @property Collection<Role> $roles
  */
 class User extends Model
 {
@@ -180,7 +182,8 @@ class UserListener
 {
     public function handleUserSaved(UserSaved $event)
     {
-        // Manually touches roles
+        // Take roles ids by batch of 1000 and run a single SQL query
+        // to bump updated_at.
         $event->user->roles()->chunk(1000, function (Collection $role) {
             Role::whereIn('id', $role->pluck('id'))->update(['updated_at' => Carbon::now()]);
         });
@@ -199,8 +202,8 @@ I have raised an [issue](https://github.com/laravel/framework/issues/39259) to l
 After a bit of discussion it has come up that fixing the framework may not be the best thing to do since this use-case
 is quite rare and the fix is a bit opinionated.
 
-Therefore, opening a [PR](https://github.com/laravel/docs/pull/7373) in laravel/docs to mention the technical limits
-of `$touches`
+Therefore, opening a [pull request](https://github.com/laravel/docs/pull/7373) in laravel/docs to mention the technical
+limits of `$touches`
 was the logical follow-up to do. Sadly, the PR was rejected without taking time to think about it.
 
 I must say I'm a bit disappointed of how the situation has ended, but... *meh*.
diff --git a/content/posts/laravel-dynamic-smtp-mail-configuration.md b/content/posts/laravel-dynamic-smtp-mail-configuration.md
index 993ec2f..cd0d1fd 100644
--- a/content/posts/laravel-dynamic-smtp-mail-configuration.md
+++ b/content/posts/laravel-dynamic-smtp-mail-configuration.md
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS=no-reply@example.org
 MAIL_FROM_NAME=Demo App
 ```
 
-> Note: The initial setup only requires these environment variables because the smtp mailer is already configured in `config/mail.php`.
+> Note: The initial setup only requires these environment variables because the smtp mailer is already configured by default in `config/mail.php`.
 
 ## 1.2. Creating an email
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ This command will generate a sample email in `app/Mail/Greetings` and you'll jus
 
 ## 1.3. Sending an email
 
-Sending an email to a user with Laravel can be either done:
+Sending an email to a user with Laravel can be either done
 
 - using `\Illuminate\Notifications\RoutesNotifications::notify`:
 
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Eh! What if we need to 'whitelabelize' our application. :-)
 
 In our scenario, we have the need to [whitelabelize](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-label_product) our application:
 each `User` will belongs to a `Provider` that will have custom SMTP settings. So when sending email to a user we need to
-configure dynamically the mailer to use the SMTP credentials of `$user->provider`.
+configure dynamically the mailer to use the SMTP credentials of his provider (`$user->provider`).
 
 **Can Laravel help us doing so?**
 
@@ -129,13 +129,28 @@ class Provider extends Model
 }
 ```
 
-The `Provider` model has many `Users` and has a `mail_configuration` field which is encrypted and that will contain
-the SMTP credentials.
+The `Provider` model has many `Users` and has a `mail_configuration` field which is encrypted and that will contain the
+SMTP credentials.
+
+The email configuration will be stored as an [encrypted](https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/encryption) JSON configuration. It
+will look like this:
+
+```json
+{
+  "host": "smtp.example.org",
+  "port": 587,
+  "username": "foo",
+  "password": "bar",
+  "encryption": "tls",
+  "from_address": "no-reply@example.org",
+  "from_name": "Example"
+}
+```
 
 ## 2.2. Digging down the internals
 
-Now that our models are ready, we must find a way to use the provider configuration to send the email. Let's dig down
-in Laravel source code to understand how emails works:
+Now that our models are ready, we must find a way to use the provider configuration to send the email. Let's dig down in
+Laravel source code to understand how emails works:
 
 Remember the two-ways of sending emails?
 
@@ -234,7 +249,7 @@ class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
             $transport->setEncryption($parameters['encryption']);
     
             $mailer = new Mailer('', $app->get('view'), new Swift_Mailer($transport), $app->get('events'));
-            $mailer->alwaysFrom($from_address, $from_name);
+            $mailer->alwaysFrom($parameters['from_address'], $parameters['from_name']);
     
             return $mailer;
         });