From bc82656c3d53b3415a44cc6686f8b4a62da8be11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Alo=C3=AFs=20Micard?= Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:38:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove dead link --- content/posts/docker-swarm-is-not-dead-yet.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/posts/docker-swarm-is-not-dead-yet.md b/content/posts/docker-swarm-is-not-dead-yet.md index cc7e840..c844a84 100644 --- a/content/posts/docker-swarm-is-not-dead-yet.md +++ b/content/posts/docker-swarm-is-not-dead-yet.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ description = "" showFullContent = false +++ -I have written an article on the provisioning of a Docker Swarm cluster from scratch ([you can read it here](https://blog.creekorful.com/how-to-provision-a-secure-docker-swarm-cluster-from-scratch)) and I have received a lot of comments stating that docker swarm is dead and that I should be moving to Kubernetes instead. +I have written an article on the provisioning of a Docker Swarm cluster from scratch and I have received a lot of comments stating that docker swarm is dead and that I should be moving to Kubernetes instead. # What happened to docker? @@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ Apparently, a lot of docker entreprise customers has requested support and invol That's a very exciting news: we will continue to have an easier Kubernetes alternative, an alternative that is better suited for simple workflow and test laboratories. -Happy hacking! \ No newline at end of file +Happy hacking!